Suche nach Personen

plus im Publikationsserver
plus bei BASE
plus bei Google Scholar

Daten exportieren

 

AI is not as conscious as humans : Essentialism in mental state attributions to artificial systems

Titelangaben

Verfügbarkeit überprüfen

Longin, Louis ; Karpus, Jurgis ; Meertens, Nadine ; Bahrami, Bahador ; Deroy, Ophelia:
AI is not as conscious as humans : Essentialism in mental state attributions to artificial systems.
In: Cognition : international journal of cognitive science. 278 (Januar 2027): 106733.
ISSN 0010-0277

Volltext

Open Access
[img]
Vorschau
Text (PDF)
Veröffentlichungsstatus: Veröffentlichte Version
Verfügbar unter folgender Lizenz: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons: Namensnennung (CC BY 4.0) .

Download (2MB) | Vorschau
Volltext Link zum Volltext (externe URL):
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106733

Kurzfassung/Abstract

Artificial systems increasingly behave in ways that resemble humans. But is that sufficient to make us see them as conscious, or as having related mental states? We contrast two broad possibilities. People may rely on a single general principle: the more appropriately an agent responds to its environment, the more conscious it is, whether human or artificial. We call this a functionalist attribution. Alternatively, people may reserve consciousness for certain kinds of beings: even an artificial system that behaves just as responsively as a human is judged less conscious. This is an essentialist attribution. A further question is whether this pattern is unique to consciousness or extends to closely related constructs such as awareness. In two pre-registered sets of studies (five experiments, N = 1092), UK participants read scenarios describing human or artificial agents whose responsiveness to spatial, social, and temporal features of the environment varied, and rated the agents' consciousness and awareness, either separately or in conjunction. Attributions of consciousness followed an essentialist logic: at similar levels of responsiveness, participants consistently attributed greater consciousness to humans. Attributions of awareness followed a functionalist pattern: for both humans and artificial agents, awareness increased steadily with responsiveness, although humans were rated more aware at the highest levels. These findings suggest that people use different inferential rules for different mental concepts. Consciousness is treated as depending on what an agent is; awareness largely on what an agent does.

Weitere Angaben

Publikationsform:Artikel
Schlagwörter:Mind perception; Mental state attribution; Artificial intelligence; Consciousness; Folk psychology; Psychological essentialism; Anthropomorphism
Sprache des Eintrags:Englisch
Institutionen der Universität:School of Transformation and Sustainability > Professur für Philosophie und Ethik der Digitalisierung
DOI / URN / ID:10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106733
Open Access: Freie Zugänglichkeit des Volltexts?:Ja
Peer-Review-Journal:Ja
Verlag:Elsevier
Die Zeitschrift ist nachgewiesen in:
Titel an der KU entstanden:Ja
KU.edoc-ID:37204
Eingestellt am: 09. Okt 2026 07:34
Letzte Änderung: 09. Okt 2026 07:34
URL zu dieser Anzeige: https://edoc.ku.de/id/eprint/37204/
AnalyticsGoogle Scholar