Suche nach Personen

plus im Publikationsserver
plus bei BASE
plus bei Google Scholar

Daten exportieren

 

Consumption choices and policy preferences under social interdependence

Titelangaben

Verfügbarkeit überprüfen

Holzmann, Matthias:
Consumption choices and policy preferences under social interdependence.
Eichstätt ; Ingolstadt, 2026. - XI, 277 S.
(Dissertation, 2026, Katholische Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt)

Volltext

Open Access
[img]
Vorschau
Text (PDF)
Verfügbar unter folgender Lizenz: Gesetz über Urheberrecht und verwandte Schutzrechte.

Download (14MB) | Vorschau
Volltext Link zum Volltext (externe URL):
https://doi.org/10.17904/ku.opus-1074

Kurzfassung/Abstract

This dissertation examines how social interdependence and institutional settings shape environmentally relevant consumption choices and support for regulation. Across three experimental studies, it investigates how individuals respond to negative consumption externalities when responsibility can be shifted to others, individual actions are embedded in market interactions, or regulatory decisions affect different groups.

Chapter 1 studies consumption choices involving a trade-off between personal monetary gains and CO2 emissions. It distinguishes between replacement excuses, according to which others would substitute foregone consumption, and waste excuses, according to which abstention may result in wasted resources. Both excuses increase selfish consumption, shift perceived social norms in its favor, and reduce the associated moral costs, with waste excuses generating the largest behavioral effect.

Chapter 2 examines how sharing a market with another consumer affects support for CO2 pricing. Although the resulting possibility of replacement increases aggregate externalities, it reduces support for CO2 pricing only when revenues are allocated to the general state budget. The behavioral effect is consistent with realized replacement rather than with beliefs about being replaced.

Chapter 3 investigates whether support for regulation depends on who is regulated. Individuals are most willing to impose a binding allocation when their own outcome is affected, less willing when the regulation also affects another person, and least willing when it affects only others. Regulation choices are more strongly related to concerns about decision autonomy and misalignment with one’s own future preferences than to concerns about satisfying others’ preferences.

Overall, the findings show that environmentally relevant choices and support for regulation depend not only on material incentives and environmental consequences, but also on how responsibility, social interaction, and decision autonomy are structured and perceived.

Weitere Angaben

Publikationsform:Hochschulschrift (Dissertation)
Zusätzliche Informationen:Kumulative Dissertation
Schlagwörter:Umweltökonomie; Verbraucherverhalten; Kohlendioxidemission; Carbon Pricing; Externer Effekt
Themenfelder:Nachhaltigkeit
Sprache des Eintrags:Englisch
Institutionen der Universität:Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät > Volkswirtschaftslehre > VWL, insb. Mikroökonomik
Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät > Dissertationen / Habilitationen
DOI / URN / ID:10.17904/ku.opus-1074
Open Access: Freie Zugänglichkeit des Volltexts?:Ja
Titel an der KU entstanden:Ja
KU.edoc-ID:37076
Eingestellt am: 01. Sep 2026 11:02
Letzte Änderung: 01. Sep 2026 11:02
URL zu dieser Anzeige: https://edoc.ku.de/id/eprint/37076/
AnalyticsGoogle Scholar