Titelangaben
Mehler-Klamt, Amrei Christin ; Köstler, Natascha ; Huber, Jana ; Warmbein, Angelika ; Rathgeber, Ivanka ; Gutmann, Marcus ; Biebl, Johanna Theresia ; Hübner, Lucas ; Schroeder, Ines ; Scharf-Janßen, Christina ; Ohneberg, Christoph ; Kraft, Eduard ; Zoller, Michael ; Fischer, Uli ; Eberl, Inge:
Can Mobilising Specialists be Relieved by a Robotic System for the Early Mobilisation of Intensive-Care Patients? : a Quantitative Longitudinal Study at Two Data Collection Points at a German University Hospital.
In: International journal of social robotics. (31. Januar 2025).
ISSN 1875-4791
Volltext
![]()
|
Text (PDF)
Verfügbar unter folgender Lizenz: ![]() Download (770kB) | Vorschau |
|
![]() |
Link zum Volltext (externe URL): https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-025-01208-7 |
Kurzfassung/Abstract
Immobility in intensive-care patients can lead to significant health risks and costs for the health system. Reasons for this include the shortage of specialist staff in nursing and physiotherapy who typically handle mobilisation activities for intensive-care patients. The use of robotic systems aims to facilitate early mobilisation and thereby counteract prolonged immobility. Whether this can also alleviate the workload for staff has not yet been sufficiently investigated. To examine the psychological stress and behaviour of mobilising specialist during conventional and robot-assisted mobilisations of intensive-care patients and to draw conclusions regarding the impact on and relief for the mobilising staff due to the robotic system, a quantitative longitudinal study was conducted with two data collection points (T1, T2). Aspects of body posture, the perceived stress of mobilising staff, as well as the time and personnel required for mobilisation were collected through non-participatory standardised observations. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis of the observations of 35 conventional mobilisations (T1) and 55 robot-assisted mobilisations (T2). Additionally, a follow-up was conducted for nine robot-assisted mobilisations to assess the routine use of the robotic system. The duration of robot-assisted mobilisation had significantly longer process compared to conventional mobilisation. A significant correlation was found between the subjectively assessed feasibility of mobilisation and psychological stress (PSaR) experienced by the specialist staff during robot-assisted mobilisation. The more confident users felt in robot-assisted mobilisation, the less psychologically stressfull they found it. Overall, robot-assisted mobilisation was more ergonomic and less stressful for the musculoskeletal system of the users.
Trial registration clinicaltrials.org TRN: NCT05071248, Date: 2021/10/21 URL https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05071248.
Forschungsprojekte
Weitere Angaben
Publikationsform: | Artikel |
---|---|
Sprache des Eintrags: | Englisch |
Institutionen der Universität: | Fakultät für Soziale Arbeit (FH) > Professur für Pflegewissenschaft |
DOI / URN / ID: | 10.1007/s12369-025-01208-7 |
Open Access: Freie Zugänglichkeit des Volltexts?: | Ja |
Peer-Review-Journal: | Ja |
Verlag: | Springer |
Die Zeitschrift ist nachgewiesen in: | |
Titel an der KU entstanden: | Ja |
KU.edoc-ID: | 34538 |
Letzte Änderung: 03. Feb 2025 08:48
URL zu dieser Anzeige: https://edoc.ku.de/id/eprint/34538/