im PublikationsserverTitelangaben
König, Julia
; Unterhitzenberger, Johanna ; Calmer, Charlotta ; Kohout, Pia ; Karl, Regina ; Rosner, Rita ; Butollo, Willi:
What was helpful in today’s session? : Responses of clients in two different psychotherapies for posttraumatic stress disorder.
In: Psychotherapy. 57 (2020) 3.
- S. 437-443.
ISSN 0033-3204 ; 1939-1536
Volltext
|
Link zum Volltext (externe URL): https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/pst0000295 |
Kurzfassung/Abstract
The aim of this study was to qualitatively analyze and compare the written responses clients in treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) gave when asked about helpful and negative aspects of the previous session. Data were collected during a randomized quantitative study comparing dialogical exposure therapy (DET, a gestalt-based integrative therapy, n = 58) and cognitive processing therapy (CPT, a cognitive– behavioral therapy, n 52). We developed a coding manual using Mayring’s (2015) qualitative content analysis approach and were able to code responses reliably. Five main categories emerged, unspecified and specific therapy elements, therapeutic relationship, client process, and general positive experience, with the first three containing subcategories. Each therapy had its own codes for specific therapy elements, while the other codes were identical for both treatments. The results for specific therapy elements were in accordance with the theories behind the two treatments, with CPT clients naming cognitive factors most frequently, whereas in DET, emotions were the most frequently mentioned. Results for therapeutic relationship were surprisingly similar given that DET therapists consider the therapeutic relationship to be an active ingredient, while CPT therapists consider it as the basis for the intervention rather than a working mechanism in itself.
Weitere Angaben
| Publikationsform: | Artikel |
|---|---|
| Schlagwörter: | cognitive– behavioral therapy, gestalt therapy, qualitative research methods, PTSD, cognitive processing therapy |
| Sprache des Eintrags: | Englisch |
| Institutionen der Universität: | Philosophisch-Pädagogische Fakultät > Psychologie > Lehrstuhl für Klinische und Biologische Psychologie |
| DOI / URN / ID: | 10.1037/pst0000295 |
| Open Access: Freie Zugänglichkeit des Volltexts?: | Nein |
| Peer-Review-Journal: | Ja |
| Verlag: | Educational Publishing Foundation |
| Die Zeitschrift ist nachgewiesen in: | |
| Titel an der KU entstanden: | Ja |
| KU.edoc-ID: | 26567 |
Letzte Änderung: 11. Dez 2021 19:13
URL zu dieser Anzeige: https://edoc.ku.de/id/eprint/26567/
