Suche nach Personen

plus im Publikationsserver
plus bei BASE
plus bei Google Scholar

Daten exportieren

 

Animal advocacy, fear and loathing in academia : A response to Helena Pedersen

Titelangaben

Verfügbarkeit überprüfen

Horsthemke, Kai:
Animal advocacy, fear and loathing in academia : A response to Helena Pedersen.
In: Ethics and Education. 16 (2021) 2. - S. 178-181.
ISSN 1744-9642 ; 1744-9650

Kurzfassung/Abstract

Helena Pedersen’s powerful keynote address poses the question: What prevents education from becoming a transformative force in times of ‘omnicide’, that is, ‘the annihilation of everything’? She locates at least part of the response in ‘institutional anxiety’, which constitutes a (social-) psychological barrier to radical change. In particular, she discusses anxiety related to the moral standing of non-human animals as a threat to human exceptionalism in educational practice and research. Institutional anxiety, as I show in my discussion of a recent manifestation at a university in South Africa, also occurs in post-liberation societies, when ‘university teachers confront’ or consider confronting ‘their own colleagues with requests for deconstruction of the anthropocentric infrastructure of their own workplace’ (Pedersen), colleagues they know to have been historically marginalised or disenfranchised. However, as I hope to make clear in my response, there are some ways of confrontation that are less divisive than others.

Weitere Angaben

Publikationsform:Artikel
Schlagwörter:Animal advocacy; anxiety; academia
Sprache des Eintrags:Englisch
Institutionen der Universität:Philosophisch-Pädagogische Fakultät > Pädagogik > Lehrstuhl für Bildungsphilosophie und Systematische Pädagogik
Open Access: Freie Zugänglichkeit des Volltexts?:Nein
Peer-Review-Journal:Ja
Verlag:Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group
Die Zeitschrift ist nachgewiesen in:
Titel an der KU entstanden:Nein
KU.edoc-ID:26559
Eingestellt am: 18. Mai 2021 14:07
Letzte Änderung: 05. Okt 2021 20:23
URL zu dieser Anzeige: https://edoc.ku.de/id/eprint/26559/
AnalyticsGoogle Scholar