Suche nach Personen

plus im Publikationsserver
plus bei BASE
plus bei Google Scholar

Daten exportieren

 

Difficulties in Conducting Long Term Follow Ups in Psychotherapy Research—Issues in the Literature and Data From a Randomized Therapy Comparison Study for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Titelangaben

Verfügbarkeit überprüfen

König, Julia ; Karl, Regina ; Rosner, Rita ; Butollo, Willi:
Difficulties in Conducting Long Term Follow Ups in Psychotherapy Research—Issues in the Literature and Data From a Randomized Therapy Comparison Study for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder.
In: The journal of nervous and mental disease. 206 (2018) 7. - S. 513-521.
ISSN 0022-3018

Volltext

Volltext Link zum Volltext (externe URL):
https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000000844

Kurzfassung/Abstract

Studies of psychotherapy for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) typically encompass short follow-up periods, leading to a dearth of information on the long-term course of symptoms after treatment. We summarize existing long-term follow-up studies and highlight the issues making such research difficult. In this context, we report on a 2-year follow-up on a randomized treatment study comparing dialogical exposure therapy and cognitive processing therapy for adults with PTSD after type I trauma. Many of the problems connected to long-term follow-up also pertained to this study. Attrition was high, and the recruited sample was not representative of the study completers. Gains made during therapy were mostly stable,with no significant differences between interventions. At least for an originally successful subset of patients, the gainsmade during both treatments in our study tended to stay stable 2 years after the end of treatment.

Weitere Angaben

Publikationsform:Artikel
Schlagwörter:Long term follow up, posttraumatic stress disorder, gestalt therapy, cognitive processing therapy
Sprache des Eintrags:Englisch
Institutionen der Universität:Philosophisch-Pädagogische Fakultät > Psychologie > Lehrstuhl für Klinische und Biologische Psychologie
DOI / URN / ID:10.1097/NMD.0000000000000844
Open Access: Freie Zugänglichkeit des Volltexts?:Nein
Peer-Review-Journal:Ja
Verlag:Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Die Zeitschrift ist nachgewiesen in:
Titel an der KU entstanden:Ja
KU.edoc-ID:21951
Eingestellt am: 01. Okt 2018 13:27
Letzte Änderung: 11. Dez 2021 19:09
URL zu dieser Anzeige: https://edoc.ku.de/id/eprint/21951/
AnalyticsGoogle Scholar