Suche nach Personen

plus im Publikationsserver
plus bei BASE
plus bei Google Scholar

Daten exportieren

 

Climate for evidence-based mental health care implementation in Germany : psychometric investigation of the Implementation Climate Scale (ICS)

Titelangaben

Verfügbarkeit überprüfen

Szota, Katharina ; Christiansen, Hanna ; Aarons, Gregory A. ; Ehrhart, Mark G. ; Fischer, Anne ; Rosner, Rita ; Steil, Regina ; Barke, Antonia:
Climate for evidence-based mental health care implementation in Germany : psychometric investigation of the Implementation Climate Scale (ICS).
In: Scientific Reports. 13 (2023): 5311.
ISSN 2045-2322

Volltext

Open Access
[img]
Vorschau
Text (PDF)
Verfügbar unter folgender Lizenz: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) Creative Commons: Namensnennung (CC BY 4.0) .

Download (1MB) | Vorschau
Volltext Link zum Volltext (externe URL):
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-32282-4

Kurzfassung/Abstract

Organizational implementation climate is an important construct in implementation research to describe to what extent implementation is expected, supported, and rewarded. Efforts in bridging the research-practice gap by implementing evidence-based practice (EBP) can benefit from consideration of implementation climate. The Implementation Climate Scale (ICS) is a psychometrically strong measure assessing employees’ perceptions of the implementation climate. The present cross-sectional study aimed at providing a German translation and investigating its psychometric properties. The translation followed standard procedures for adapting psychometric instruments. German psychotherapists (N = 425) recruited online completed the ICS, the Evidence Based Practice Attitudes Scale (EBPAS-36D) and the Intention Scale for Providers (ISP). We conducted standard item and reliability analyses. Factorial validity was assessed by comparing an independent cluster model of Confirmatory Factorial Analysis (ICM-CFA), a Bifactor CFA, a Second-order CFA and an (Bifactor) Exploratory Structural Equation Model (ESEM). Measurement invariance was tested using multiple-group CFA and ESEM, convergent validity with correlation analysis between the ICS and the ISP subjective norms subscale (ISP-D-SN). The mean item difficulty was pi = .47, mean inter-item correlation r = .34, and mean item-total correlation ritc = .55. The total scale (ω = 0.91) and the subscales (ω = .79–.92) showed acceptable to high internal consistencies. The model fit indices were comparable and acceptable (Second-order CFA: RMSEA [90% CI] = .077 [.069; .085], SRMR = .078, CFI = .93). Multiple-group CFA and ESEM indicated scalar measurement invariance across gender and presence of a psychotherapy license. Psychotherapists in training reported higher educational support for EBP than licensed psychotherapists (T = 2.09, p = .037, d = 0.25). The expected high correlation between the ICS and the ISP-D-SN was found (r = .59, p < .001). Results for the German ICS confirm good psychometric properties including validity.

Weitere Angaben

Publikationsform:Artikel
Sprache des Eintrags:Englisch
Institutionen der Universität:Philosophisch-Pädagogische Fakultät > Psychologie > Lehrstuhl für Klinische und Biologische Psychologie
DOI / URN / ID:10.1038/s41598-023-32282-4
Open Access: Freie Zugänglichkeit des Volltexts?:Ja
Peer-Review-Journal:Ja
Verlag:Macmillan Publishers Limited, part of Springer Nature
Die Zeitschrift ist nachgewiesen in:
Titel an der KU entstanden:Ja
KU.edoc-ID:34854
Eingestellt am: 10. Mär 2025 12:12
Letzte Änderung: 10. Mär 2025 12:12
URL zu dieser Anzeige: https://edoc.ku.de/id/eprint/34854/
AnalyticsGoogle Scholar