im PublikationsserverTitelangaben
Tschikof, Martin ; Stammel, Barbara
; Weigelhofer, Gabriele ; Bondar-Kunze, Elisabeth ; Costea, Gabriela ; Pusch, Martin ; Srđević, Zorica ; Benka, Pavel ; Vizi, Dávid Béla ; Borgs, Tim ; Hein, Thomas:
Cross-scale and integrative prioritization of multi-functionality in large river floodplains.
In: Journal of environmental management. 358 (Mai 2024): 120899.
ISSN 1095-8630 ; 0301-4797
Volltext
![[img]](https://edoc.ku.de/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
|
Text (PDF)
Verfügbar unter folgender Lizenz:  Creative Commons: Namensnennung (CC BY 4.0)
.
Download (5MB) | Vorschau |
|
|
Link zum Volltext (externe URL): https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120899 |
Kurzfassung/Abstract
Floodplains provide an extraordinary quantity and quality of ecosystem services (ES) but are among the most threatened ecosystems worldwide. The uses and transformations of floodplains differ widely within and between regions. In recent decades, the diverse pressures and requirements for flood protection, drinking water resource protection, biodiversity, and adaptation to climate change have shown that multi-functional floodplain management is necessary. Such an integrative approach has been hampered by the various interests of different sectors of society, as represented by multiple stakeholders and legal principles. We present an innovative framework for integrated floodplain management building up on ES multi-functionality and stakeholder involvement, forming a scientifically based decision-support to prioritize adaptive management measures responding at the basin and local scales. To demonstrate its potential and limitations, we applied this cross-scaled approach in the world's most international and culturally diverse basin, the Danube River Basin in Europe. We conducted large-scale evaluations of anthropogenic pressures and ES capacities on the one hand and participatory modelling of the local socio-ecohydrological systems on the other hand. Based on our assessments of 14 ES and 8 pressures, we recommend conservation measures along the lower and middle Danube, restoration measures along the upper-middle Danube and Sava, and mitigation measures in wide parts of the Yantra, Tisza and upper Danube rivers. In three case study areas across the basin, stakeholder perceptions were generally in line with the large-scale evaluations on ES and pressures. The positive outcomes of jointly modelled local measures and large-scale synergistic ES relationships suggest that multi-functionality can be enhanced across scales. Trade-offs were mainly present with terrestrial provisioning ES at the basin scale and locally with recreational activities. Utilizing the commonalities between top-down prioritizations and bottom-up participatory approaches and learning from their discrepancies could make ecosystem-based management more effective and inclusive.
Forschungsprojekte
Weitere Angaben
| Publikationsform: | Artikel |
|---|---|
| Schlagwörter: | Ecosystem services; Ecosystem-based management; DPSIR; Fuzzy cognitive mapping; Spatial prioritization; Riparian zones |
| Themenfelder: | Nachhaltigkeit |
| Sprache des Eintrags: | Englisch |
| Institutionen der Universität: | Mathematisch-Geographische Fakultät > Geographie > Professur für Angewandte Physische Geographie und KU-Forschungsstelle Aueninstitut Neuburg |
| DOI / URN / ID: | 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.120899 |
| Open Access: Freie Zugänglichkeit des Volltexts?: | Ja |
| Peer-Review-Journal: | Ja |
| Verlag: | Elsevier |
| Die Zeitschrift ist nachgewiesen in: | |
| Titel an der KU entstanden: | Ja |
| KU.edoc-ID: | 34166 |
Letzte Änderung: 19. Dez 2024 08:00
URL zu dieser Anzeige: https://edoc.ku.de/id/eprint/34166/
