im PublikationsserverTitelangaben
Huebner, Lucas ; Warmbein, Angelika ; Scharf, Christina ; Schroeder, Ines ; Manz, Kirsi ; Rathgeber, Ivanka ; Gutmann, Marcus ; Biebl, Johanna ; Mehler-Klamt, Amrei Christin
; Huber, Jana ; Eberl, Inge ; Kraft, Eduard ; Fischer, Uli ; Zoller, Michael:
Effects of robotic-assisted early mobilization versus conventional mobilization in intensive care unit patients : prospective interventional cohort study with retrospective control group analysis.
In: Critical care : the leading online forum for critical care, intensive care and emergency medicine. 28 (6. April 2024) 1: 112.
- 5 S.
ISSN 1466-609x ; 1364-8535
Volltext
![[img]](https://edoc.ku.de/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
|
Text (PDF)
Verfügbar unter folgender Lizenz:  Creative Commons: Namensnennung (CC BY 4.0)
.
Download (753kB) | Vorschau |
|
|
Link zum Volltext (externe URL): https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-024-04896-1 |
Kurzfassung/Abstract
Background: Approximately one in three survivors of critical illness suffers from intensive-care-unit-acquired weakness, which increases mortality and impairs quality of life. By counteracting immobilization, a known risk factor, active mobilization may mitigate its negative effects on patients. In this single-center trial, the effect of robotic-assisted early mobilization in the intensive care unit (ICU) on patients' outcomes was investigated.
Methods: We enrolled 16 adults scheduled for lung transplantation to receive 20 min of robotic-assisted mobilization and verticalization twice daily during their first week in the ICU (intervention group: IG). A control group (CG) of 13 conventionally mobilized patients after lung transplantation was recruited retrospectively. Outcome measures included the duration of mechanical ventilation, length of ICU stay, muscle parameters evaluated by ultrasound, and quality of life after three months.
Results: During the first week in the ICU, the intervention group received a median of 6 (interquartile range 3-8) robotic-assisted sessions of early mobilization and verticalization. There were no statistically significant differences in the duration of mechanical ventilation (IG: median 126 vs. CG: 78 h), length of ICU stay, muscle parameters evaluated by ultrasound, and quality of life after three months between the IG and CG.
Conclusion: In this study, robotic-assisted mobilization was successfully implemented in the ICU setting. No significant differences in patients' outcomes were observed between conventional and robotic-assisted mobilization. However, randomized and larger studies are necessary to validate the adequacy of robotic mobilization in other cohorts.
Trial registration: This single-center interventional trial was registered in clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05071248 on 27/08/2021.
Forschungsprojekte
Weitere Angaben
| Publikationsform: | Artikel |
|---|---|
| Schlagwörter: | Adult; Humans; Retrospective Studies; Early Ambulation; Quality of Life; Cohort Studies; Prospective Studies; Control Groups; Robotic Surgical Procedures; Intensive Care Units; Respiration; Critical Illness/therapy |
| Sprache des Eintrags: | Englisch |
| Institutionen der Universität: | Fakultät für Soziale Arbeit (FH) > Professur für Pflegewissenschaft |
| DOI / URN / ID: | 10.1186/s13054-024-04896-1 |
| Open Access: Freie Zugänglichkeit des Volltexts?: | Ja |
| Peer-Review-Journal: | Ja |
| Verlag: | Springer Nature |
| Die Zeitschrift ist nachgewiesen in: | |
| Titel an der KU entstanden: | Ja |
| KU.edoc-ID: | 33825 |
Letzte Änderung: 04. Nov 2024 09:46
URL zu dieser Anzeige: https://edoc.ku.de/id/eprint/33825/
