Titelangaben
Humer, Elke ; Pieh, Christoph ; Kuska, Martin ; Barke, Antonia ; Doering, Bettina K. ; Goßmann, Katharina ; Trnka, Radek ; Meier, Zdenek ; Kascakova, Natalia ; Tavel, Peter ; Probst, Thomas:
Provision of psychotherapy during the COVID-19 pandemic among Czech, German and Slovak psychotherapists.
In: International journal of environmental research and public health. 17 (2020) 13: 4811.
- 15 S.
ISSN 1660-4601
Volltext
Link zum Volltext (externe URL): https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17134811 |
Kurzfassung/Abstract
Psychotherapists around the world are facing an unprecedented situation with the outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19). To combat the rapid spread of the virus, direct contact with others has to be avoided when possible. Therefore, remote psychotherapy provides a valuable option to continue mental health care during the COVID-19 pandemic. The present study investigated the fear of psychotherapists to become infected with COVID-19 during psychotherapy in personal contact and assessed how the provision of psychotherapy changed due to the COVID-19 situation and whether there were differences with regard to country and gender. Psychotherapists from three European countries: Czech Republic (CZ, n = 112), Germany (DE, n = 130) and Slovakia (SK, n = 96), with on average 77.8% female participants, completed an online survey. Participants rated the fear of COVID-19 infection during face-to-face psychotherapy and reported the number of patients treated on average per week (in personal contact, via telephone, via internet) during the COVID-19 situation as well as (retrospectively) in the months before. Fear of COVID-19 infection was highest in SK and lowest in DE (p < 0.001) and was higher in female compared to male psychotherapists (p = 0.021). In all countries, the number of patients treated on average per week in personal contact decreased (p < 0.001) and remote psychotherapies increased (p < 0.001), with more patients being treated via internet than via telephone during the COVID-19 situation (p < 0.001). Furthermore, female psychotherapists treated less patients in personal contact (p = 0.036), while they treated more patients via telephone than their male colleagues (p = 0.015). Overall, the total number of patients treated did not differ during COVID-19 from the months before (p = 0.133) and psychotherapy in personal contact remained the most common treatment modality. Results imply that the supply of mental health care could be maintained during COVID-19 and that changes in the provision of psychotherapy vary among countries and gender.
Weitere Angaben
Publikationsform: | Artikel |
---|---|
Schlagwörter: | psychotherapy; COVID-19; public health; fear of infection; remote psychotherapy |
Sprache des Eintrags: | Englisch |
Institutionen der Universität: | Philosophisch-Pädagogische Fakultät > Psychologie > Lehrstuhl für Klinische und Biologische Psychologie |
DOI / URN / ID: | 10.3390/ijerph17134811 |
Open Access: Freie Zugänglichkeit des Volltexts?: | Ja |
Peer-Review-Journal: | Ja |
Verlag: | MDPI AG |
Die Zeitschrift ist nachgewiesen in: | |
Titel an der KU entstanden: | Ja |
KU.edoc-ID: | 27363 |
Letzte Änderung: 13. Feb 2023 10:16
URL zu dieser Anzeige: https://edoc.ku.de/id/eprint/27363/